أفRiviera Plus
PoliticsNews report

Elections are a Life or Death Battle for Netanyahu

Nihad Abu Ghosh On the eve of the Israeli elections scheduled for October 27, Benjamin Netanyahu has an election campaign that he does not tire of repeating, and he does not miss any opportunity to list his achievements in the wars that have not stopped over the past three years: We killed Sinwar and Haniya, we destroyed Gaza,

+

Riviera Plus

·6 minutes read

Elections are a Life or Death Battle for Netanyahu

Writer

Nihad Abu Ghosh

On the eve of the Israeli elections scheduled for October 27 of this month, Benjamin Netanyahu has an election campaign that he does not tire of repeating, and he does not miss any opportunity to enumerate his achievements in the wars that have not stopped over the past three years: We killed Sinwar and Haniya, we destroyed Gaza, and we killed Nasrallah and Khamenei, we controlled vast territories in southern Lebanon and most of Gaza, and we established security zones and buffer lines in Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza. Israel is stronger than ever, and its planes operate freely in the skies of the Middle East.

Despite all these achievements, Netanyahu has not succeeded in achieving a single central goal: he has not erased the shame of the greatest failure in Israel's history, which is the failure of October 7, where the vast majority of the Israeli public holds him responsible for the greatest failure due to the priorities set by his government and his disregard for warnings that came to him from several local and regional parties. Moreover, his policies have caused an unprecedented isolation for Israel on the international stage and have created a deep rift in Israeli society due to his favoritism towards extremist religious groups and hardline settlers. Criticism of Netanyahu intensifies as he has dismissed and removed all officials responsible for leading the army and security agencies, changing the Minister of Defense, the Chief of Staff, and leaders of intelligence agencies, the Shin Bet, and Mossad, while he clings to his position, refusing any accountability or investigation committee, realizing that losing power could lead him to prison on corruption charges.

Thus, the upcoming election battle appears to be a matter of life or death for Netanyahu, who always enjoys a considerable level of support from the Israeli Jewish community, a percentage that hovers around 40%, fluctuating based on events. However, it indicates a deep and sharp division within Israeli society. This audience, attached to Netanyahu, supports him despite all the corruption charges associated with him, and an absolute autocratic style of governance that tends to marginalize institutions, relying on loyalists and zealous supporters from the settler community, religious Zionists, and Orthodox Jews (Haredim), as well as the lower classes of Eastern Jews and residents of poor neighborhoods and what are called "development towns." All these factions are opposed by a broad front that includes parties like (Yesh Atid) led by Gadi Eisenkot, the (Yahad) bloc led by the duo Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid, the (Yisrael Beiteinu) party led by Avigdor Lieberman, and the leftist Zionist Democratic Party led by Yair Golan, not to mention the two Arab lists that neither of the Zionist camps wants to rely on. The sentiment of these forces is that any option is acceptable to them except for Netanyahu, who has destroyed the Israeli political system and corrupted political life.

One of the biggest sins attributed to Netanyahu is his causing a deep rift with American Jews, the decline in Israel's popularity and status among the broad American public, especially among the Democratic Party's base and the younger generation.

Estimates indicate that Netanyahu will not accept his defeat and may resort to any pretext or trick to cancel or postpone the elections if he realizes that his defeat is inevitable. Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak described Netanyahu's state as acting like a "wounded beast" and may resort to any action to cancel the elections, including a fabricated escalation on one of the open fronts, such as Iran, Lebanon, Gaza, the West Bank, and Syria, declaring war and postponing the elections, thus scattering all the cards and mixing them with the existing political alignments.

One of Netanyahu's options was to disqualify the Arab lists, and a proposal to that effect was presented to the parliamentary election committee, but the Supreme Court overturned the decision. However, this card has not been completely withdrawn from Netanyahu's hands, who can use alternative tools to limit the influence of Arabs, including using Ben Gvir's police and settler and fascist militias to intimidate and terrorize Arabs, preventing them from voting, and causing serious problems at polling stations.

One of the options that Netanyahu may resort to is to challenge the election results if they are not in his favor, similar to what President Trump did when he was defeated by Joe Biden, when his supporters stormed the Capitol and took control of it for several hours before then-Vice President Mike Pence resolved the dispute. However, Netanyahu will not be satisfied with relying on legal tools, and he may create problems with the election committees and with his opponents. Whatever he does, he will enjoy the support of the right-wing public eager to impose its control over state institutions.

Public opinion polls have indicated for several years a clear advantage for Netanyahu's opponents over his supporters, although the polls vary sharply. Polls from Channel 14 and i24 give Netanyahu's camp a decisive advantage over his opponents, but other polls, most notably the weekly poll from Maariv and the polls from Channels 12 and 13, show a clear preference for Netanyahu's opponents. However, it is important to note two significant observations regarding the polls:

1. The polls give the right-wing and far-right forces a lower percentage than they actually receive for several reasons, including that some respondents are embarrassed to express their support for extremist right-wing forces, while they may actually do so during the secret ballot. Additionally, the turnout rate is much higher among religious and extremist forces than among secular and liberal forces. Those who belong to the latter groups may support one team but prefer another aspect of their lives and refrain from going to vote, while religious and fascist forces see elections as a holy war that must be fought until the last vote.

2. Recently, indicators have begun to show a situation closer to a tie between the two camps, a situation that prevents either from reaching the threshold of 61 seats, especially with about 12 seats for the Arab lists. What has reinforced this state of equilibrium is that two far-right parties that were fluctuating around the electoral threshold have recently shown that they have surpassed the threshold (3.25%). These are the Religious Zionism party led by Bezalel Smotrich, united with the 'Zehut' party, and the new party 'Your People Israel' led by General Ofer Winter, whose electoral program focuses on the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza as a top priority. The success of these two parties in surpassing the threshold means the possibility of a tie between the two camps and a slight chance of a slight advance for Netanyahu.

There are two serious possibilities: either the upcoming elections will not be decisive, and no party or coalition will be able to form a government without relying on an Arab list. In this case, Israel will enter a political crisis similar to that experienced between 2019 and 2021, when five rounds of elections were held in less than two years, and Netanyahu remains in his position as the head of a caretaker government.

New developments may change the political landscape between one election round and another, leading to the dissolution of some forces and the emergence of new ones. These are possibilities in favor of Netanyahu because his main opponent, the Yesh Atid party, is not an institutional party with established structures and frameworks; rather, it is an emergency electoral formation that could dissolve as quickly as it was formed, especially since it does not have any substantial alternatives to Netanyahu's policies, neither regarding the occupation and the Palestinians nor on the internal front, except for its slogans about conscription.

The other option is to form a national unity government between the two main parties, Likud and Yesh Atid, along with some other forces, a coalition that excludes the Arab lists and may exclude figures like Ben Gvir and Smotrich. This option recalls Netanyahu's maneuvers when he formed a rotating government with Benny Gantz, who was heading the Blue and White party. Netanyahu held the premiership for more than a year and refused to carry out the rotation, leading to the dissolution of the government in June 2021.

Source: Ma'an News Agency

Stay informed

Follow related sections on Riviera Plus

More from Politics

Suggested

Read also

Martyr and Injuries from Settler and Occupation Forces' Gunfire in Burqa North of NablusPolitics

Martyr and Injuries from Settler and Occupation Forces' Gunfire in Burqa North of Nablus

1 minuteWednesday, 7 October 2026 at 08:32