Exchanges and Expulsion of Diplomats: Details of the Reasons Behind Addis Ababa's Escalation Against Cairo
Listen to the article. The audio text is generated by an automated system.
Riviera Plus
·4 minutes read

Listen to the article. The audio text is automatically generated by a machine system.
The diplomatic crisis between Cairo and Addis Ababa has escalated sharply following Ethiopia's sudden decision to declare a member of the Egyptian embassy as "persona non grata" and demand their departure, to which Egypt immediately responded by applying the principle of reciprocity and expelling the Ethiopian embassy advisor in Cairo.
This rapid escalation casts a shadow over the already strained relations between the two countries and complicates the already complex scene in the Horn of Africa and the Nile Basin.
Amid this rising tension, attention turns to the true motives and objectives that prompted the Ethiopian government to take this uncalculated step against the Egyptian diplomatic mission. Egyptian experts, politicians, and legal scholars interpret the scene as a tool for exporting Ethiopia's internal crises both domestically and internationally, while warning of the dangers of undermining the remaining channels of communication between the two major countries.
In this context, Dr. Haitham Imran, a professor of political science and international law at Suez University, stated in exclusive remarks to "Al Arabiya.net" and "Al Hadath.net" that the Ethiopian Foreign Ministry's decision to declare an Egyptian diplomat as persona non grata reflects the depth of tension and the sensitive phases that the relations between Cairo and Addis Ababa are going through. He added that although Article 9 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 grants the host state absolute sovereign rights to take such action without the need for justification, the timing and speed of the decision provide political indications that go beyond the usual procedural frameworks, placing the most important communication channel between the two countries under additional pressure.
Imran added that "from a geopolitical perspective, this development is read in the context of the intertwined disputes and the intense regional competition in the Nile Basin and the Horn of Africa," considering that Addis Ababa's resort to this step is a taut political message that complicates the paths to de-escalation.
He continued that "international law provisions have granted Egypt graduated options that began with procedural commitment to end the tasks of the concerned diplomat, immediately relying on its inherent right to the principle of reciprocity by expelling an Ethiopian diplomat of the same rank, reaching advanced options such as summoning the ambassador for consultations or reducing the level of diplomatic representation."
The professor of international law pointed out that "in the end, maintaining a minimum of diplomatic communication channels is a strategic necessity that is indispensable for the security and stability of the region," explaining that closing dialogue windows or tightening the noose on missions will not serve to resolve complex issues, but rather creates an environment of mutual suspicion, which requires resorting to tools of quiet diplomacy and prioritizing shared vital interests, while Cairo cautiously adheres to rational paths that preserve the dignity and sovereignty of the state and prevent diplomatic channels from slipping into a point of no return.
For his part, Ambassador Salah Halima, former Assistant Foreign Minister of Egypt, confirmed to "Al Arabiya.net" and "Al Hadath.net" that Ethiopia has taken a step in a completely wrong direction, explaining that the current security and political developments in Ethiopia are linked to its internal conditions.
Halima cited the statement issued by a coalition of seven armed political forces in Ethiopia, pointing out that it clearly defined its goals without room for interpretation, "which confirms the absence of any external intervention or support, as the federal government in Addis Ababa has not provided any evidence proving the involvement of any foreign party."
The former Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs continued, saying: "It seems that Addis Ababa has resorted to this step as a pretext to justify its crises and policies that have been met with widespread rejection from those national forces, whose demands have reached the point of overthrowing the federal system itself."
Halima concluded her statements by saying: "Although one of the established principles of Egypt's foreign policy is non-interference in the internal affairs of countries and maintaining their unity and territorial integrity, the decisive Egyptian response came as a primary and swift measure based on the principle of reciprocity," expressing hope that Ethiopia would realize that its relations with neighboring countries should be built on respect for international treaties and laws, and should not head towards escalation based on unfounded and baseless claims.
Suggested
Read also
World“It did not succeed against Trump before.” The US Secretary of Defense responds to the Democrats’ efforts to isolate him
SportsThis is what Mohamed Salah did after losing to Trabzonspor from Freiburg in Germany
Sports