France protests... An Israeli account inflames the immigration battle with fabricated nude photos

Listen to the article. The audio text is automated, generated by an automated system

A semi-naked elderly couple surrounded by masked men...a photo that claimed rioters stripped two eighty-year-old victims of their clothes during the Paris protests, before investigations revealed that it was fake. An account whose location in Israel was determined by the “X” platform contributed to its publication, while the image turned into fuel for a political battle targeting the left, immigrants, and Muslims, amid unresolved questions about the party behind it.

The photo of the elderly couple was not just a shocking snapshot that swept social networking sites in France. Rather, it turned into an issue that reveals how a single artificial image can enter the heart of a political and social crisis, and give incitement narratives visual material that is difficult to ignore.

In the wake of the protests on Saturday, October 17, which witnessed acts of looting, vandalism, and confrontations in a number of French cities, a picture spread of an elderly man and woman wearing underwear, while masked people appeared next to them. It was accompanied by an allegation that the couple, who were over eighty, were robbed and stripped of their clothes in the vicinity of Place de la République in Paris.

The message was clear: the protests were no longer just a social movement, but rather, according to the story accompanying the photo, they had turned into a direct threat to elderly citizens, their security, and their dignity. But the problem is that the photo that was used to embody this narrative was not an actual documentation of the incident.

In an investigation published by the French channel TF1 on October 19, it was found that the image was generated by artificial intelligence, and that multiple versions of it spread with almost the same comments, despite the different details of the scene.

Verification tools revealed digital indicators confirming that the image was created or modified using artificial intelligence, while clear visual defects appeared, including incomplete fingers and illogical overlap in the bodies of the people appearing in the scene.

Most importantly, the Paris Prosecutor’s Office confirmed to TF1 that it does not have information confirming the occurrence of the alleged assault, and called for dealing with the circulating story with caution. Thus, the photo is no longer evidence of a crime committed during the protests, but rather has itself become a subject of investigation and scrutiny.

One of the most sensitive details of the case lies in the spread of the second photo. According to the TF1 investigation, this copy was published on Sunday, October 18, at approximately 12:30 p.m., via an account on the “X” platform, whose location in Israel appears according to the account data. The publisher attached the photo to a political message accusing the French state of losing control, and describing the far left as turning the country into a war zone.

The image quickly spread to other accounts, including those of the far right in France and abroad, before its circulation expanded in French and English.

The TF1 investigation estimated the number of publications that dealt with the novel at more than 50,000 publications in French, and an approximately similar number in English, according to data from the content monitoring platform Visibrain. One of the versions also exceeded six million views on “X,” according to another report by the channel.

These numbers reveal the extent of the spread, but they do not prove that everyone who reposted the image was part of a coordinated campaign, nor that all accounts acted under the direction of one party.

The presence of the publishing account in Israel raises a question about the identity of its owner and his possible connections.

The image did not spread in a vacuum. It came at a moment when France was witnessing widespread protests over the costs of living, conditions of education, and public services, coinciding with acts of violence and looting that some actors exploited to promote competing political narratives.

In this context, the image carries a message that goes beyond the allegation of a crime: it depicts French society as a victim of a security collapse, and allows those who promote it to link this collapse to the far left, immigration, and Islam.

The image does not need to explicitly mention Muslims in order to be used within a discourse targeting them, especially when it is attached to leaflets that talk about immigrants, what is described as “Islamism,” or the loss of control on the streets.

Le Monde newspaper monitored the spread of misleading materials, fabricated clips and pictures in conjunction with the protests, while the Spanish news agency EFE documented the circulation of the same image in publications that accused the demonstrators of stealing the elderly’s property and clothes.

But there is not sufficient evidence to say that all of these publications were launched from one center, or that one campaign was designed by a government agency with the aim of igniting a religious and ethnic conflict in France.

Political Front: The image was used to confirm a narrative that the far left was responsible for the chaos, and that the French government had lost control. This gives opponents of the left powerful emotional substance, even if the event depicted in the image is unproven.

Identity Front: The narrative accompanying the image contributed to fueling a discourse linking crime to immigration and religious affiliation. The danger here is that the actions of individuals, or even separate real incidents, will turn into a collective accusation against Muslims and immigrants, without data proving that they are the main responsible for the looting.

Digital Front: The case revealed that artificial intelligence is capable of producing an image that looks realistic enough to pass initial scrutiny, and then turning it into transnational political fodder. In this case, the protests themselves were not required to be fabricated; Acts of violence and looting actually occurred, and adding a visually impressive incident to real events makes the fabricated narrative more believable.

What is proven is that the photo of the couple was fake, and that an account that the “X” platform located in Israel contributed to the publication of one of its copies, and that the photo was used in strongly worded political messages against the French left. Whether the Israeli government was behind the production of the photo or ran an organized campaign to inflame religious, ethnic, and political divisions in France has not been proven by published information that could be verified.

To prove this, it is necessary to trace the accounts that posted the image first, identify their owners and their possible connections, and examine whether there is coordination, funding, or common direction between them. The geographical location of the account, no matter how remarkable, is not sufficient evidence of the responsibility of the country in which it is located.

However, the case raises a broader question about exploiting international conflicts to influence internal debates in European countries, especially when issues of immigration, Islam, and Palestine intersect with intense political polarization.

The spread of the image coincided with real scenes of looting and vandalism, which made distinguishing between truth and fakery more difficult, according to observers. When the public sees documented images of smashed facades and burning cars, they are more willing to believe another image claiming a horrific attack, even if it is fabricated.

Thus, the image not only misled those who saw it; Rather, it threatened to transform anger at specific crimes that should be investigated into hostility toward broad groups whose collective responsibility is not proven by evidence.

The result is that the discussion may deviate from the basic questions: What are the reasons for the protests? Who committed the looting? How did the authorities fail to estimate the scale of the movements? Who benefits politically from portraying the crisis as a conflict between the French and immigrants or between Muslims and non-Muslims?

The image of the elderly couple reveals how artificial intelligence can create a scene whose reality has not been proven, and then this scene turns into a tool in a political and identity battle. Between the artificial reality and the real division, the most dangerous outcome remains turning a false image into fuel for real hatred.